Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 22:36:20 -0500
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 10:28 PM Steve Downey <sdowney_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Study Group 16 std::text Technical Direction
>
Thanks so much for doing this, Steve. Two nits: 1) The issues in Areas of
Discussion are stated as questions, but they currently lack question marks.
2) Boost.Text is actually code complete now, but of course will probably
change during a Boost review.
One crazy guy shouting into the wilderness point: I'm probably alone, but
I don't think we need, nor do we want, allocators. (Discuss!) I
understand if I'm alone in this view.
Zach
> Study Group 16 std::text Technical Direction
>
Thanks so much for doing this, Steve. Two nits: 1) The issues in Areas of
Discussion are stated as questions, but they currently lack question marks.
2) Boost.Text is actually code complete now, but of course will probably
change during a Boost review.
One crazy guy shouting into the wilderness point: I'm probably alone, but
I don't think we need, nor do we want, allocators. (Discuss!) I
understand if I'm alone in this view.
Zach
Received on 2018-10-03 05:36:32