Can you explain why? For now the ISO reference is enough, but in the future we will need the Unicode Standard reference because ISO 10646 is only the character set.

On May 4, 2018 11:57:08 PM GMT+02:00, keld_at_[hidden] wrote:
>I qould like that we use the reference to ISO 10646 instead of the
>unicode inc. reference.
>I have advocated that for quite a long time now.
>
>Best regards
>keld
>
>On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 09:43:22PM +0000, Steve Downey wrote:
>> I've been told that some people believe there's a policy that ISO
>Standards
>> must cite other ISO Standards where those are available, which is why
>we're
>> citing the ISO copies of Unicode and ECMAScript. I can't find an
>actual
>> policy on this, though.
>> I'm willing to put in the Unicode.org preferred reference, with a
>fallback
>> to the ISO reference. My only fear is that too many choices will lead
>to
>> paralysis.
>>
>> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 4:44 PM JF Bastien <cxx_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> > The Unicode standard has guidance on how to cite it:
>> >
>> > http://www.unicode.org/versions/index.html#Citations
>> >
>> > It would be useful to link to this guidance (and follow it).
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Steve Downey <sdowney_at_[hidden]>
>wrote:
>> >
>> >> https://github.com/steve-downey/sg16/blob/d10250/papers/D1025R0.md
>> >>
>> >> There are some formatting issues I will clean up, in particular
>changing
>> >> the links to not raw links, and moving the links down to a
>bibliography
>> >> section.
>> >>
>> >> Also adding a title at the top.
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Unicode mailing list
>> >> Unicode_at_[hidden]
>> >> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
>> >>
>> >>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Unicode mailing list
>> Unicode_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
>
>_______________________________________________
>Unicode mailing list
>Unicode_at_[hidden]
>http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode