On May 4, 2018 11:57:08 PM GMT+02:00, keld@keldix.com wrote:

I qould like that we use the reference to ISO 10646 instead of the unicode inc. reference.
I have advocated that for quite a long time  now.

Best regards
keld

On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 09:43:22PM +0000, Steve Downey wrote:
 I've been told that some people believe there's a policy that ISO Standards
 must cite other ISO Standards where those are available, which is why we're
 citing the ISO copies of Unicode and ECMAScript. I can't find an actual
 policy on this, though.
 I'm willing to put in the Unicode.org preferred reference, with a fallback
 to the ISO reference. My only fear is that too many choices will lead to
 paralysis.
 
 On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 4:44 PM JF Bastien <cxx@jfbastien.com> wrote:
 
 The Unicode standard has guidance on how to cite it:

 http://www.unicode.org/versions/index.html#Citations

 It would be useful to link to this guidance (and follow it).

 On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Steve Downey <sdowney@gmail.com> wrote:

 https://github.com/steve-downey/sg16/blob/d10250/papers/D1025R0.md

 There are some formatting issues I will clean up, in particular changing
 the links to not raw links, and moving the links down to a bibliography
 section.

 Also adding a title at the top.


 Unicode mailing list
 Unicode@isocpp.open-std.org
 http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode




 Unicode mailing list
 Unicode@isocpp.open-std.org
 http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode


Unicode mailing list
Unicode@isocpp.open-std.org
http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode