I qould like that we use the reference to ISO 10646 instead of the unicode inc. reference.
I have advocated that for quite a long time now.

Best regards
keld

On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 09:43:22PM +0000, Steve Downey wrote:
> I've been told that some people believe there's a policy that ISO Standards
> must cite other ISO Standards where those are available, which is why we're
> citing the ISO copies of Unicode and ECMAScript. I can't find an actual
> policy on this, though.
> I'm willing to put in the Unicode.org preferred reference, with a fallback
> to the ISO reference. My only fear is that too many choices will lead to
> paralysis.
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 4:44 PM JF Bastien <cxx_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> > The Unicode standard has guidance on how to cite it:
> >
> > http://www.unicode.org/versions/index.html#Citations
> >
> > It would be useful to link to this guidance (and follow it).
> >
> > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Steve Downey <sdowney_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> >> https://github.com/steve-downey/sg16/blob/d10250/papers/D1025R0.md
> >>
> >> There are some formatting issues I will clean up, in particular changing
> >> the links to not raw links, and moving the links down to a bibliography
> >> section.
> >>
> >> Also adding a title at the top.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Unicode mailing list
> >> Unicode_at_[hidden]
> >> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
> >>
> >>

> _______________________________________________
> Unicode mailing list
> Unicode_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode