Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 19:56:57 +0200
On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 at 19:48, Andrei Zissu <andrziss_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> As it's still an MVP in C++26, the key decision to make for now is whether to use contracts at all. It's not that unfortunate having to wait 3 more years for a riper product if the 1st minimal edition doesn't yet fit your use cases. Some of us though will be able to use them, and we should be allowed to.
It's organizationally non-trivial to make a decision whether to use
contracts at all. And perhaps it would be reasonable for early
adopters
of an experimental feature to use an experimental white paper
implementation, instead of an IS implementation, when there's probably
not going to be any availability difference between those.
> I should have made an effort to come up with some proper pun for you calling over two decades of contract work (including half a decade of SG21) "as fast as possible", but I know I'm no match for your linguistic skills. 😉
Time spent is not really a measure of cohesiveness or quality.
>
> As it's still an MVP in C++26, the key decision to make for now is whether to use contracts at all. It's not that unfortunate having to wait 3 more years for a riper product if the 1st minimal edition doesn't yet fit your use cases. Some of us though will be able to use them, and we should be allowed to.
It's organizationally non-trivial to make a decision whether to use
contracts at all. And perhaps it would be reasonable for early
adopters
of an experimental feature to use an experimental white paper
implementation, instead of an IS implementation, when there's probably
not going to be any availability difference between those.
> I should have made an effort to come up with some proper pun for you calling over two decades of contract work (including half a decade of SG21) "as fast as possible", but I know I'm no match for your linguistic skills. 😉
Time spent is not really a measure of cohesiveness or quality.
Received on 2025-10-27 17:57:13