But that was closed: “SG21 has consensus against pursuing this paper any further.”

Roger
________________________________
From: SG15 <sg15-bounces_at_lists.isocpp.org> on behalf of Ville Voutilainen via SG15 <sg15_at_[hidden]>
Sent: 23 October 2025 20:23
To: sg21_at_lists.isocpp.org <sg21_at_[hidden]>
Cc: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]>; sg15_at_[hidden] <sg15_at_[hidden]>
Subject: Re: [isocpp-sg15] [isocpp-sg21] P3835 -- Different contract checking for different libraries

On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 at 22:20, Nevin Liber via SG21
<sg21_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 12:09 PM John Spicer via SG15 <sg15_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> It also blocks later adoption of a contract feature that would make C++ better.
>
>
> SD-4: "Delay vs. bird in the hand. We cannot act on ideas without papers, and we do not significantly delay progress on concrete proposals in order to wait for alternative proposals we might get in the future. [...]"
>
> What is the paper number of the proposal of the contract feature which the C++26 CD is blocking later adoption of?

https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2025/p3640r0.pdf
_______________________________________________
SG15 mailing list
SG15_at_[hidden]
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg15