On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 at 02:03, Herb Sutter <herb.sutter_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Ville:
> > So, you're saying that the closing of
> > https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/2277 after an SG23 discussion in Sofia
>
> I think you mean SG21?

No, I don't. The issue says "SG23 saw P3640R0 during the Sofia meeting
and took two polls"
And the SG23 chair closed the issue. This information is all there in the issue.

> > was procedurally incorrect?
> I wasn't aware of this at the time (can't keep up with all papers), but some thoughts -- I could be overlooking something: As an extension (it's proposing an additional feature, not just a change) it was already procedurally late for C++26's new-feature deadline. To the extent it's a change proposal to the current design that's now in EWG, it would ideally have been going (also) to EWG with the usual caveat of "schedule permitting" in case EWG doesn't have bandwidth to get to all papers. But I could be overlooking something; this is a quick reply to your question.

I come from a culture where a yes/no question is answered with either
yes or no, but fine, there's all kinds of cultures.