Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 16:33:53 +0300
On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 at 16:22, Timur Doumler <cpp_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Right. So, as I tried to explain in an earlier email, this discussion is essentially just about the question what the default syntax (no labels) should mean?
It's about what constitutes a standalone package with good enough
pros/cons that that's worthy of nailing to the door as an IS to be
used for years.
And how we determine what's good enough, and with what plausibility.
>
> Right. So, as I tried to explain in an earlier email, this discussion is essentially just about the question what the default syntax (no labels) should mean?
It's about what constitutes a standalone package with good enough
pros/cons that that's worthy of nailing to the door as an IS to be
used for years.
And how we determine what's good enough, and with what plausibility.
Received on 2025-10-20 13:34:08