There is a difference between consensus and majority that should not be
ignored.

The "best we can do" does not imply "good enough". In particular,
it does not mean "good enough for an IS".

On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 6:00 PM Timur Doumler <cpp_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
> On 17 Oct 2025, at 14:36, JOSE DANIEL GARCIA SANCHEZ <
> josedaniel.garcia_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> saying we discussed this before does not solve the problem.
>
>
> True, it does not solve the problem, but it does mean that the problem has
> been recognised, acknowledged, the possible approaches to the problem have
> been discussed, and as result of those discussions we had consensus that
> what we have in the C++26 working draft today is the best we can do about
> it.
>
> Cheers,
> Timur
>
>