On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 14:46:15 +0000, Bret Brown via SG15 wrote:
> In the interest of considering compromises, I have a thought. In addition
> to the an output directory setting, should we consider an analog of
> dependency scanning transparency for these extra output files? At least
> eventually? I am thinking something similar to P1689 or clang-scan-deps or
> GCC's -M flags, but including ancillary and implicit output files.

P1689 already has fields for additional outputs of the command line
given: the `outputs` array. This is intended for things like
`-gsplit-dwarf` and the like.

--Ben