I don't see that opinions as objections but how should we proceed in vendors **before we get a conclusion in SG15**.
You can take a look at https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75741 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75741 > to get the full context.
Thanks,
Chuanqi
------------------------------------------------------------------
From: SG15 <sg15_at_[hidden]>
Send Time:2023 Dec. 20 (Wed.) 14:35
To: SG15 <sg15_at_[hidden]>
Cc:Ran Regev <regev.ran_at_[hidden]>
Subject:Re: [SG15] Proposal for module metadata format to be used by the std library and others
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023, 21:56 Mark de Wever via SG15 <sg15_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg15_at_[hidden] >> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 04:56:32PM -0500, Daniel Ruoso via SG15 wrote:
> As discussed in the meeting on 2023-12-12, I'm putting together a proposal
> for the metadata format to be used both when discovering the std modules as
> well as for pre-built libraries in general.
 Based on this proposal I've created a libc++ PR [1]. I got a lot of
 pushback regarding installing modules in a directory parallel to
 include.
Can you please elaborate on the objections?
I've changed that directory. The current tentative location is
 <prefix>/usr/share/libc++/v1/
 I'm still working on a Clang patch to provide the name of the manifest
 file.
 [1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75741 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75741 >
 Cheers,
 Mark
 _______________________________________________
 SG15 mailing list
SG15_at_[hidden].org <mailto:SG15_at_[hidden] >
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg15 <https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg15 >