On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 02:45:41PM -0500, Daniel Ruoso via SG15 wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023, 13:45 Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Since local-arguments (which I presume to mean compiler command line
> > options) are necessarily implementation specific, I think this should
> > either be generalized or named such that it reflects an implementation
> > dependency.
> >
>
> I am actually considering we can under-specify this for now. Unless someone
> can point at a use case where we already need local arguments for the std
> modules

In libc++ vendors can build the library without support for exceptions.
In that case the module needs to be build with "-fno-exceptions" too.

Mark