On Wed, Dec 13, 2023, 11:30 Ben Boeckel <ben.boeckel_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> That may also work. Do we want a top-level versioning for the whole
> thing still? Having an object be top-level is, IMO, better anyways as we
> can extend it while an array ends up with an oddball parent-influencing
> member.
>

Maybe have the versions as keys in that object?

That would have the advantage of making it clear they are alternatives for
the same data...

Daniel