Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 09:27:04 +0100
Color me surprised.
In what way are they unimplementable?
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 8:16 AM Boris Kolpackov via SG15 <
sg15_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Ville Voutilainen via SG15 <sg15_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> > I would hesitate to suggest or leave room for the impression that
> > modules were standardized without adequate tooling consideration.
> > Furthermore, some new language facilities just do have adoption
> > challenges, that's sometimes the nature of the beast. The
> > tooling-feedback from e.g. build system developers hasn't thus far
> > revealed a need to do major design surgery to modules, as far as I
> > have understood.
>
> To add to what Ben said, there is a growing sentiment in the community
> that header units are basically unimplementable and should just be
> dropped.
> _______________________________________________
> SG15 mailing list
> SG15_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg15
>
In what way are they unimplementable?
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 8:16 AM Boris Kolpackov via SG15 <
sg15_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Ville Voutilainen via SG15 <sg15_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> > I would hesitate to suggest or leave room for the impression that
> > modules were standardized without adequate tooling consideration.
> > Furthermore, some new language facilities just do have adoption
> > challenges, that's sometimes the nature of the beast. The
> > tooling-feedback from e.g. build system developers hasn't thus far
> > revealed a need to do major design surgery to modules, as far as I
> > have understood.
>
> To add to what Ben said, there is a growing sentiment in the community
> that header units are basically unimplementable and should just be
> dropped.
> _______________________________________________
> SG15 mailing list
> SG15_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg15
>
Received on 2023-11-17 08:27:16