C++ Logo

sg15

Advanced search

Re: [isocpp-sg21] Contracts and tooling

From: Ran Regev <regev.ran_at_[hidden]>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 09:23:43 +0200
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 9:16 AM Boris Kolpackov via SG21 <
sg21_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Ville Voutilainen via SG15 <sg15_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> > I would hesitate to suggest or leave room for the impression that
> > modules were standardized without adequate tooling consideration.
> > Furthermore, some new language facilities just do have adoption
> > challenges, that's sometimes the nature of the beast. The
> > tooling-feedback from e.g. build system developers hasn't thus far
> > revealed a need to do major design surgery to modules, as far as I
> > have understood.
>
> To add to what Ben said, there is a growing sentiment in the community
> that header units are basically unimplementable and should just be
> dropped.
>

Can you please point to documents, articles, forums, etc. that show this
growing sentiment?

_______________________________________________
> SG21 mailing list
> SG21_at_[hidden]
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg21
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/sg21/2023/11/5593.php
>

Received on 2023-11-17 07:23:56