On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 17:30:05 +0200, Ran Regev wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023, 17:19 Joshua Berne <berne_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > SG15 and SG23 both discussed P2947 last week. Has there been new
> > information published to indicate that it needs to be revisited?
> >
>
> I think it should at least be discussed within SG21 as SG15 suggested:
> https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21kona2023/SG15P2947.

I would suggest at least incorporating the feedback received in SG23 and
SG15 as a new revision before going back to SG21. If there's no new
content for SG21 to look at, it's the "same paper" that was forwarded to
SG23.

--Ben