Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 23:36:35 +0200
On 23/05/2023 17.54, Daniel Ruoso via SG15 wrote:
> And that so far
> all early experiences rely on the user not selecting the wrong header
> to be importable
The set of importable headers that an implementation supports is
implementation-defined, not (primarily) user-defined.
One valid implementation strategy would be to offer only the
standard library headers as importable headers.
In any case, I would really appreciate a very specific,
concrete example (exemplary source code) of the troubles
you seem to be talking about. If three two-line files
suffice to show the principles, that's good enough.
I have the gut feeling there is an assumption hidden somewhere
in your arguments that might not be universally shared.
Jens
> And that so far
> all early experiences rely on the user not selecting the wrong header
> to be importable
The set of importable headers that an implementation supports is
implementation-defined, not (primarily) user-defined.
One valid implementation strategy would be to offer only the
standard library headers as importable headers.
In any case, I would really appreciate a very specific,
concrete example (exemplary source code) of the troubles
you seem to be talking about. If three two-line files
suffice to show the principles, that's good enough.
I have the gut feeling there is an assumption hidden somewhere
in your arguments that might not be universally shared.
Jens
Received on 2023-05-23 21:36:43