C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: Meeting in Varna?

From: Jens Maurer <jens.maurer_at_[hidden]>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 09:26:08 +0200
Rene, I suggest that you talk to Gaby off-line, since apparently there is
less than desirable contribution from an important vendor for the Ecosystem IS.
(It might take time for that vendor to form a consolidated opinion, which is

Seek to identify issues of contention early; I don't want to spend days
in CWG on wording review for something that is unlikely to get consensus
in plenary.


On 23/05/2023 00.40, Gabriel Dos Reis via SG15 wrote:
> The question was specifically about "--xxx", note the double dash (not single dash).
> -- Gaby
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2023 1:03 PM
> To: sg15_at_[hidden]
> Cc: René Ferdinand Rivera Morell <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]>; Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr_at_[hidden]>; Herb Sutter <hsutter_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: Re: [SG15] Meeting in Varna?
> On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 22:56, Gabriel Dos Reis via SG15
> <sg15_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> [Jens]
>>> Oh, and I'm seeing "--std-info" as a command-line option. I thought
>>> Microsoft, for instance, is using the /xxx option format. Has the use
>>> of "--xxx" been socialized with Microsoft?
>> Not to my knowledge.
> Uh huh. This https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/reference/compiler-options?view=msvc-170
> says "You may use either a forward slash (/) or a dash (-) to specify
> a compiler option."
> I ran into that when looking at how to use address sanitizer with MSVC
> in cmake. The instructions
> said "just add -fsanitize=address", and I was all "uh, where's the
> MSVC version of this?", and realized
> that that *is* the MSVC version, too, since MSVC accepts dash options
> as well as slash options.
> _______________________________________________
> SG15 mailing list
> SG15_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg15

Received on 2023-05-23 07:26:17