C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: Meeting in Varna?

From: René Ferdinand Rivera Morell <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 00:08:55 -0500
Sorry about this.. But I just realized I made a mistake in reading my
calendar. The vote I'm thinking of is not to start an official ISO
work item. It's an EWG "green light" vote. Sorry for the confusion.
Just consider this as yet another off-by-one in the long history of
such errors :-(

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 1:17 PM Herb Sutter <hsutter_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > >> Herb, I thought we wanted New Work Item Proposals only when we had something
> > >> resembling a Working Draft with fairly fleshed-out content, to avoid the
> > >> embarrassment of cancelling a project at the ISO level. What's the current
> > >> approach here?
> We do both in a single poll: When there's a document ready to adopted by plenary as an initial working draft, we have a combined poll to adopt it as such and to direct the convenor to request a new project for it. This way we never have a work item without a draft.

-- René Ferdinand Rivera Morell
-- Don't Assume Anything  -- No Supone Nada
-- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net

Received on 2023-05-23 05:09:09