Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 16:32:33 -0700
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 3:29 PM Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Please clarify the kind of “scope of reorganization” that isn’t already contained in that paper.
Gaby,
Mostly what I'm looking for is for us to get a clear grasp of the
problems we're trying to solve with modularization of the standard
library. P0581 lays out a solution quite well, but I want to hear more
about the problems (ex: overload sets, performance implications of
large vs small modules, user impact of the current crufty
organization) and which of them we want to prioritize solving.
I think this mailing list thread has largely answered my question
about what we want to do (or at least, what the options are).
Thanks for your insight!
>
> Please clarify the kind of “scope of reorganization” that isn’t already contained in that paper.
Gaby,
Mostly what I'm looking for is for us to get a clear grasp of the
problems we're trying to solve with modularization of the standard
library. P0581 lays out a solution quite well, but I want to hear more
about the problems (ex: overload sets, performance implications of
large vs small modules, user impact of the current crufty
organization) and which of them we want to prioritize solving.
I think this mailing list thread has largely answered my question
about what we want to do (or at least, what the options are).
Thanks for your insight!
Received on 2020-03-09 18:35:45