Michael –

The premise of the paper


  * .s in module names exist in support of submodules

Is not factually correct. I didn’t introduce that convention in support of ‘submodules’.

-- Gaby

From: SG15 <sg15-bounces_at_[hidden]> On Behalf Of Michael Spencer via SG15
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 11:26 PM
To: SG15 <sg15_at_[hidden]>
Cc: Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs_at_[hidden]>
Subject: [SG15] Paper for Saturday CppCon Tooling meeting: remove.dots.in.module.names

At the request of the Tooling subgroup chair, I've attached D1873r0.0 (remove.dots.in.module.names). I'd like to discuss the Tooling relevant parts of it on Saturday.

I would like to restrict this discussion to how tooling is intending to make use of `.` in module names (section 2 of the paper), as the rest of the paper is outside the scope of the Tooling subgroup and this is a very late paper.

- Michael Spencer