Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 00:05:29 +0200
On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 at 23:58, Ben Boeckel <ben.boeckel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I think we're eventually going to see projects wanting to not have
> headers at all and that means that `-devel` packages will need
> *something*. But I'm personally leaning towards it being a compiler
> thing, not a language thing. IIRC, there was mention on Reddit of a
> format Microsoft was working on for distilling a module down to an
> interface description. Getting *that* as a shippable and consumable
> format would be great.
You mean http://www.stroustrup.com/macis09.pdf?
Also https://github.com/GabrielDosReis/ipr
> I think we're eventually going to see projects wanting to not have
> headers at all and that means that `-devel` packages will need
> *something*. But I'm personally leaning towards it being a compiler
> thing, not a language thing. IIRC, there was mention on Reddit of a
> format Microsoft was working on for distilling a module down to an
> interface description. Getting *that* as a shippable and consumable
> format would be great.
You mean http://www.stroustrup.com/macis09.pdf?
Also https://github.com/GabrielDosReis/ipr
Received on 2019-02-09 23:05:43