If anyone can figure out how to make modules play nice with icecream, I
have a ~1200 core cluster I'd be happy to run experiments on.

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 4:58 PM Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 3:28 PM Robert Maynard <robert.maynard_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>> The initial version had only performance numbers from a laptop.
>> R1/draft includes performance numbers from multiple 3 additional build
>> machines.
>>
>
> 4 more machines now. By Kona I expect to have at least one other test to
> measure incremental build performance also.
>
>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 4:14 PM Matthew Woehlke
>> <mwoehlke.floss_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 28/01/2019 15.57, Bryce Adelstein Lelbach aka wash wrote:
>> > > I'd like to focus on module lookup/naming/dependencies and look over
>> > > P1427 and P1441.
>> > I can't find *P*1441?
>> >
>> > I assume we're talking about a notionally published version of
>> >
>> https://bfgroup.github.io/cpp_tooling_stats/modules/modules_perf_D1441R1.html
>> > ...is there anything important in the (missing?) final version vs. the
>> > draft?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matthew
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Tooling mailing list
>> > Tooling_at_[hidden]
>> > http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/tooling
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tooling mailing list
>> Tooling_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/tooling
>>
>
>
> --
> -- Rene Rivera
> -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
> -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tooling mailing list
> Tooling_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/tooling
>