Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 14:24:09 -0600
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:47 AM JF Bastien <cxx_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:53 AM Corentin <corentin.jabot_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello.
> > I would like to suggest two modules related proposals that I think SG15
> should look at.
> >
> > - Compiler enforced mapping between module names and module interface
> file (resource) name.
>
> Why does SG15 need to do this, versus someone implementing it in an
> open-source toolchain, trying it out, and bringing what using it
> taught them to SG15?
Are we willing to vote NO on merging modules to the IS until we do such an
implementation and wait for build system and dependency management
implementation experience?
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:53 AM Corentin <corentin.jabot_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello.
> > I would like to suggest two modules related proposals that I think SG15
> should look at.
> >
> > - Compiler enforced mapping between module names and module interface
> file (resource) name.
>
> Why does SG15 need to do this, versus someone implementing it in an
> open-source toolchain, trying it out, and bringing what using it
> taught them to SG15?
Are we willing to vote NO on merging modules to the IS until we do such an
implementation and wait for build system and dependency management
implementation experience?
-- -- Rene Rivera -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net
Received on 2019-01-10 21:24:21