Good point, thanks for reminding me. It was due to a misuse of the paper
system on my part back then. I'll make sure the next one has R2 and not R1
of course.

Le mer. 1 oct. 2025 à 18:41, Jens Maurer <jens.maurer_at_[hidden]> a écrit :

>
>
> On 10/2/25 00:21, Patrice Roy wrote:
> > Thank you Jens (they are very similar and it's a typo on my part). The
> correct number is P2966, but R1 still will not be next week.
>
> R1 has been published already:
>
> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2023/p2966r1.pdf
>
> even though the number inside the paper is wrong.
>
> Jens
>
>
> > Le mer. 1 oct. 2025 à 18:14, Jens Maurer <jens.maurer_at_[hidden] <mailto:
> jens.maurer_at_[hidden]>> a écrit :
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/1/25 21:25, Patrice Roy via SG14 wrote:
> > > P2996R1 to take into account the numerous changes to the language
> since R0, as many of the objectives stated in R0 have been met through
> different efforts by various individuals
> >
> > P2996 is reflection, which is has been adopted. What is the correct
> paper number?
> >
> > Jens
> >
>
>