Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 00:41:06 +0200
On 10/2/25 00:21, Patrice Roy wrote:
> Thank you Jens (they are very similar and it's a typo on my part). The correct number is P2966, but R1 still will not be next week.
R1 has been published already:
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2023/p2966r1.pdf
even though the number inside the paper is wrong.
Jens
> Le mer. 1 oct. 2025 à 18:14, Jens Maurer <jens.maurer_at_[hidden] <mailto:jens.maurer_at_[hidden]>> a écrit :
>
>
>
> On 10/1/25 21:25, Patrice Roy via SG14 wrote:
> > P2996R1 to take into account the numerous changes to the language since R0, as many of the objectives stated in R0 have been met through different efforts by various individuals
>
> P2996 is reflection, which is has been adopted. What is the correct paper number?
>
> Jens
>
> Thank you Jens (they are very similar and it's a typo on my part). The correct number is P2966, but R1 still will not be next week.
R1 has been published already:
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2023/p2966r1.pdf
even though the number inside the paper is wrong.
Jens
> Le mer. 1 oct. 2025 à 18:14, Jens Maurer <jens.maurer_at_[hidden] <mailto:jens.maurer_at_[hidden]>> a écrit :
>
>
>
> On 10/1/25 21:25, Patrice Roy via SG14 wrote:
> > P2996R1 to take into account the numerous changes to the language since R0, as many of the objectives stated in R0 have been met through different efforts by various individuals
>
> P2996 is reflection, which is has been adopted. What is the correct paper number?
>
> Jens
>
Received on 2025-10-01 22:41:13