Well that might be a little too TL;DR, there is the small issue of
changing the default to noexcept and having at least an ABI if not an
API break to support this version of exception safety.
Any function not marked throws will in the paper call terminate if it
receives an exception, if this is not changed.
I really like the idea, but I think it might be too much for some.
/Paul

Den fre. 24. jan. 2020 kl. 17.21 skrev Michael Wong via SG14
<sg14_at_[hidden]>:
>
> HI all, in the interest of studying for the use of Exception handling in Embedded space, this paper is very useful (thanks to Bjarne pointing me to it)
> Low-Cost Deterministic C++ Exceptions for Embedded Systems
>
> https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/portal/files/78829292/low_cost_deterministic_C_exceptions_for_embedded_systems.pdf
>
>
> The general conclusion is that EH as it is is suitable for embedded systems and it only needs to be an implementation detail. This is extremely helpful to our interest.
>
> At the Prague F2F SG14 meeting, I will present this paper if there is a free slot on Friday morning's SG14 meeting if the authors cannot be present.
>
> However, James Renwick has agree to come on our March 11 monthly SG14 call to discuss this.
>
> I have already presented this paper at MISRA C++ so a wider group might be interested in these results.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SG14 mailing list
> SG14_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg14

-- 
• − − •/• −/• • −/• − • •/− • • •/•/− •/− • •/• •/− • • −/•/− •/• − −
•− •/− − •/− −/• −/• •/• − • •/• − • − • −/− • − •/− − −/− −//