Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 22:05:41 +0200
On 16/05/2025 21.29, Alisdair Meredith via SG12 wrote:
> If I have papers that will remove undefined behavior from the Standard,
> should I include tentative wording to remove the corresponding wording
> from the UB annex?
CWG will not have time to review the UB annex in Sofia, for sure.
So, if you have wording for a paper that is targeting Sofia,
just ignore the presence of the UB annex, and feel free to post
a pull request against the pending annex after your paper was
merged into the next working draft.
Caveat: It's not very likely that CWG will be able to look at
your paper in Sofia, if it's not reflection-related.
Jens
> If I have papers that will remove undefined behavior from the Standard,
> should I include tentative wording to remove the corresponding wording
> from the UB annex?
CWG will not have time to review the UB annex in Sofia, for sure.
So, if you have wording for a paper that is targeting Sofia,
just ignore the presence of the UB annex, and feel free to post
a pull request against the pending annex after your paper was
merged into the next working draft.
Caveat: It's not very likely that CWG will be able to look at
your paper in Sofia, if it's not reflection-related.
Jens
Received on 2025-05-20 20:05:48