C++ Logo

sg12

Advanced search

Re: [isocpp-sg12] Wording for Sofia

From: Herb Sutter <herb.sutter_at_[hidden]>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 11:23:16 -0700
Jens should weigh in, but that seems reasonable.

I don't know CWG's timeline for reviewing and merging the Annex branch. It's
editorial, so it might not need a plenary poll -- I don't know how we
approved other editorial Annexes in the past.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: SG12 <sg12-bounces_at_[hidden]> On Behalf Of Alisdair Meredith
> via SG12
> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2025 12:30 PM
> To: sg12_at_[hidden]
> Cc: Alisdair Meredith <alisdairm_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: [isocpp-sg12] Wording for Sofia
>
> If I have papers that will remove undefined behavior from the Standard,
> should I include tentative wording to remove the corresponding wording
from
> the UB annex?
>
> AlisdairM
> _______________________________________________
> SG12 mailing list
> SG12_at_[hidden]
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg12
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/sg12/2025/05/1055.php

Received on 2025-05-20 18:23:21