Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 20:06:32 +0100
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 at 18:52, Jens Maurer wrote:
> On 28/04/2022 15.10, Jens Maurer via SG12 wrote:
> > On 28/04/2022 14.24, Jonathan Wakely via SG12 wrote:
> >> There were a number of NB comments for C++20 related to UB in the
> preprocessor:
> >> https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21belfast/SG12 <
> https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21belfast/SG12>
> >> The response was to reject them, but create issues. Did the issues
> never get created?
> >
> > It doesn't seem so.
> >
> >> e.g. https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/26 <
> https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/26> doesn't seem to have a
> corresponding CWG issue. Is there some other issues list I should be
> looking at, or did these get dropped on the floor?
> >
> > I think that action item got dropped on the floor.
> >
> > Working on it now.
>
> Shiny new core issues are now available:
>
> CWG2573 through CWG2581
>
> at https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2573.html
Great, thanks!
>
>
> Please offer suggested resolutions.
>
> Jens
>
> On 28/04/2022 15.10, Jens Maurer via SG12 wrote:
> > On 28/04/2022 14.24, Jonathan Wakely via SG12 wrote:
> >> There were a number of NB comments for C++20 related to UB in the
> preprocessor:
> >> https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21belfast/SG12 <
> https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21belfast/SG12>
> >> The response was to reject them, but create issues. Did the issues
> never get created?
> >
> > It doesn't seem so.
> >
> >> e.g. https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/26 <
> https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/26> doesn't seem to have a
> corresponding CWG issue. Is there some other issues list I should be
> looking at, or did these get dropped on the floor?
> >
> > I think that action item got dropped on the floor.
> >
> > Working on it now.
>
> Shiny new core issues are now available:
>
> CWG2573 through CWG2581
>
> at https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2573.html
Great, thanks!
>
>
> Please offer suggested resolutions.
>
> Jens
>
Received on 2022-04-28 19:06:44