C++ Logo

sg12

Advanced search

Re: Did CWG issues ever get created for the NB comments about preprocessor UB?

From: Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 19:52:13 +0200
On 28/04/2022 15.10, Jens Maurer via SG12 wrote:
> On 28/04/2022 14.24, Jonathan Wakely via SG12 wrote:
>> There were a number of NB comments for C++20 related to UB in the preprocessor:
>> https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21belfast/SG12 <https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21belfast/SG12>
>> The response was to reject them, but create issues. Did the issues never get created?
>
> It doesn't seem so.
>
>> e.g. https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/26 <https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/26> doesn't seem to have a corresponding CWG issue. Is there some other issues list I should be looking at, or did these get dropped on the floor?
>
> I think that action item got dropped on the floor.
>
> Working on it now.

Shiny new core issues are now available:

CWG2573 through CWG2581

at https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2573.html

Please offer suggested resolutions.

Jens

Received on 2022-04-28 17:52:17