On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 at 13:20, David Vandevoorde <daveed_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> That looks really good to me. (I particularly like giving teeth to the
> pseudo-destructor calls.)
>
>
> Where is says:
>
> Within the implementation of vector, some storage is allocated to
> hold an array of up to 5 ints.
>
> should that be “4 ints” (or did you mean to call vi.reserve(5))? Or am I
> completely misunderstanding?
>

That's a typo, faithfully preserved from the previous revision of the paper
:) Will be fixed for the mailing version. Thanks!


> Daveed
>
>
>
> > On Feb 9, 2018, at 2:52 PM, Richard Smith <richardsmith_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Please find attached a revised version of P0593 based on the excellent
> discussion and feedback at the Albuquerque meeting. Please let me know if
> you have any comments; I believe our plan was to discuss this again at
> Jacksonville, and all being well, to forward it to EWG at that meeting.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Richard
> > <d0593r2.html>_______________________________________________
> > ub mailing list
> > ub_at_[hidden]
> > http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/ub
>
> _______________________________________________
> ub mailing list
> ub_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/ub
>