Subject: Re: [SG10] [isocpp-core] Missing feature-test macros
From: David Vandevoorde (daveed_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-10-04 08:56:41
Thanks for that work, Barry!
I donât disagree with any of your recommendations, and wholeheartedly agree with your constexpr changes.
While going through it I found myself really not liking the name â__cpp_familiar_template_lambdaâ: I find it quite opaque. Is there is an opportunity to rename it to â__cpp_expl_lambda_template_parametersâ or something like that?
> On Oct 3, 2019, at 11:56 PM, Barry Revzin via Core <core_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hey SG10, CWG, and LWG,
> I went through the past few years of straw polls and put together a suggestion of what feature-test macros are missing: I'm proposing that about two dozen need to be added. The draft can be found here: https://brevzin.github.io/sd6/papers/d1902r0.html <https://brevzin.github.io/sd6/papers/d1902r0.html>.
> I included every paper on the straw polls pages, so if anybody has motivation for a macro for one of the papers I listed as "no macro necessary," please let me know. Also, if you disagree with any of my recommendations, also let me know. I already pruned an earlier list with some help, and I'd like to get this right.
> I wanted to get this out earlier than the weekend before the deadline, but... that didn't happen.
> Core mailing list
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/core
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/core/2019/10/7332.php
SG10 list run by firstname.lastname@example.org