Sure.

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Richard Smith <richard_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I'd like to suggest we bump this to 201611 for P0512R0 (GCC uses 201606 for
> P0091, which has somewhat different semantics). Seem OK?
>
> On 5 October 2016 at 10:18, Richard Smith <richard_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> Sounds good to me.
>>
>> On 5 Oct 2016 7:54 am, "Jason Merrill" <jason_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>> We may not need a feature-test macro for the class template
>>> placeholder feature, but we do need one for library vendors to guard
>>> deduction guide declarations with. How about __cpp_deduction_guides?
>>>
>>> Jason
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Features mailing list
>>> Features_at_[hidden]
>>> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
>
>