Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:31:59 +0100
Hi,
I think this is a non-cosmetic change that deserves a specific feature test
macro, because if it is missing, it can be worked around(*), so it's a
candidate for conditional compilation for early adopters.
In case you agree, a proposal for the test macro could be
__cpp_nontype_template_argument_auto. Does it sound good?
Thanks for reading,
Jordi Vilar
(*) probably, everything could be worked around somehow, not just this :-)
I think this is a non-cosmetic change that deserves a specific feature test
macro, because if it is missing, it can be worked around(*), so it's a
candidate for conditional compilation for early adopters.
In case you agree, a proposal for the test macro could be
__cpp_nontype_template_argument_auto. Does it sound good?
Thanks for reading,
Jordi Vilar
(*) probably, everything could be worked around somehow, not just this :-)
Received on 2017-02-15 13:32:01