Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:57:07 -0800
I'd like to suggest we bump this to 201611 for P0512R0 (GCC uses 201606 for
P0091, which has somewhat different semantics). Seem OK?
On 5 October 2016 at 10:18, Richard Smith <richard_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Sounds good to me.
>
> On 5 Oct 2016 7:54 am, "Jason Merrill" <jason_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> We may not need a feature-test macro for the class template
>> placeholder feature, but we do need one for library vendors to guard
>> deduction guide declarations with. How about __cpp_deduction_guides?
>>
>> Jason
>> _______________________________________________
>> Features mailing list
>> Features_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
>>
>
P0091, which has somewhat different semantics). Seem OK?
On 5 October 2016 at 10:18, Richard Smith <richard_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Sounds good to me.
>
> On 5 Oct 2016 7:54 am, "Jason Merrill" <jason_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> We may not need a feature-test macro for the class template
>> placeholder feature, but we do need one for library vendors to guard
>> deduction guide declarations with. How about __cpp_deduction_guides?
>>
>> Jason
>> _______________________________________________
>> Features mailing list
>> Features_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
>>
>
Received on 2017-02-14 01:57:30