Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:18:42 -0700
Sounds good to me.
On 5 Oct 2016 7:54 am, "Jason Merrill" <jason_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> We may not need a feature-test macro for the class template
> placeholder feature, but we do need one for library vendors to guard
> deduction guide declarations with. How about __cpp_deduction_guides?
>
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> Features mailing list
> Features_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
>
On 5 Oct 2016 7:54 am, "Jason Merrill" <jason_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> We may not need a feature-test macro for the class template
> placeholder feature, but we do need one for library vendors to guard
> deduction guide declarations with. How about __cpp_deduction_guides?
>
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> Features mailing list
> Features_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
>
Received on 2016-10-05 19:18:45