C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG10] First draft of SD-6 with changes from Oulu

From: Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 19:28:07 +0100
On 19 July 2016 at 19:12, Nelson, Clark <clark.nelson_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I have incorporated all of the changes approved at the last meeting into
> the
> table for C++17. The draft can be found at:
> http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21oulu/SG10/sd-6.html
> Very few of those proposals had their own macro recommendations, but I have
> taken them into account. And as yet I haven't done anything about filling
> in
> the rationale, even for the cases for which I made my own recommendation.
> So
> we definitely have work to do.
> Up until now I have been updating SD-6 on isocpp.org basically around the
> holidays. But we might want to try to publish an update before the Issaquah
> meeting, to cover the C++17 CD.
> I'd like to schedule a telecon to make some progress on this. August 1 and
> August 15 look like plausible candidates. If anyone has any definite
> preference for one over the other, please let me know.

Maybe it doesn't matter for the purposes of SD-6, but for P0220R1 the
shared_ptr changes for arrays were approved in Jacksonville, but are not in
the CD due to editorial conflicts. P0414R0 aims to correct that.

Similarly, P0067R3 was approved in Oulu, but isn't in the CD because the
editor noticed inconsistencies in the wording which mean it needs to be
revised and go through LWG again.

If those features do make it back into the WP in time for C++17 the date
201603 might not make sense for their macros. On the other hand maybe it
does still make sense, as the substance of the proposals will still be what
was voted on in Jacksonville and Oulu respectively.

Received on 2016-07-19 20:28:29