C++ Logo

SG10

Advanced search

Subject: Re: [SG10] P0074R0: Making std::owner_less more flexible
From: W Brown (webrown.cpp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-02-23 17:36:08


> On Feb 23, 2016, at 5:31 PM, Richard Smith <richard_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Nelson, Clark <clark.nelson_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> I’m not sure what, if any, is the process required/desired of such
>>> updates.
>>
>> As established at the Urbana meeting, the process is that the consensus we
>> need is of SG10, not WG21.
>
> On that basis, I think it's sufficient for a change to have support on
> this mailing list, rather than having been visible to the full
> committee in a WG21 document, prior to being incorporated into SD-6
> (with similar amounts of time allowed for objections).
>
> So, +1 to using the attachment, following Jens' proposal.

+1

— WEB


SG10 list run by sg10-owner@lists.isocpp.org