Subject: Re: [SG10] P0074R0: Making std::owner_less more flexible
From: Richard Smith (richard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-02-23 16:31:50
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Nelson, Clark <clark.nelson_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Iâm not sure what, if any, is the process required/desired of such
> As established at the Urbana meeting, the process is that the consensus we
> need is of SG10, not WG21.
On that basis, I think it's sufficient for a change to have support on
this mailing list, rather than having been visible to the full
committee in a WG21 document, prior to being incorporated into SD-6
(with similar amounts of time allowed for objections).
So, +1 to using the attachment, following Jens' proposal.
SG10 list run by firstname.lastname@example.org