Subject: Re: [SG10] P0074R0: Making std::owner_less more flexible
From: Nelson, Clark (clark.nelson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-02-23 15:57:32
> Iâm not sure what, if any, is the process required/desired of such
As established at the Urbana meeting, the process is that the consensus we
need is of SG10, not WG21.
My personal preference is that we would do every update from a WG21
document. But I'd also prefer that the published SD-6 not have any glaring
The question is whether we have consensus within SG10 which principle
should take precedence.
> If there is no required process, then the attachment seems better
> than P0996R1.
SG10 list run by firstname.lastname@example.org