Subject: [SG10] Agenda: 06-15
From: Nelson, Clark (clark.nelson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-09 18:47:04
Monday, June 15, 2015
10:00 am | Pacific Daylight Time (San Francisco, GMT-07:00) | 2 hrs
Here is a new draft. The major change since I sent out the draft with the
minutes is that I basically just copy/pasted tables from the four recently-
published Technical Specifications. I haven't done anything yet about an
(In case anyone isn't certain, insertions and deletions are relative to the
SD-6 on isocpp.org.)
Concerning my other action items from the last meeting:
I contacted Mike Miller and Andrew Sutton about removing the "(Informative)"
annotation from the feature-testing section of the Concepts TS. They seemed
I also looked into Microsoft's plans for feature-testing. I found this page:
which, in the comments, includes this brief and disappointing quote from STL:
We currently have no plans to implement feature-test macros.
So I contacted him about it. A discussion with various Microsoft people
ensued, which resulted in Herb's cross-posting from Thursday last. So expect
more discussion in Kona.
But in thinking about that discussion, I thought it would be generally
helpful to spell out an implication in 3.1p3, so I added a sentence.
My goals for this meeting are:
Everyone takes one last look at the rationale section for C++17;
Settle questions that remain about C++17 macro names;
Get volunteers to produce rationale or example for new changes made in
-- Clark Nelson Chair, PL22.16 (ANSI C++ standard committee) Intel Corporation Chair, SG10 (C++ SG for feature-testing) clark.nelson_at_[hidden] Chair, CPLEX (C SG for parallel language extensions)
SG10 list run by firstname.lastname@example.org