C++ Logo

SG10

Advanced search

Subject: Re: [SG10] Updates to SD-6
From: Jonathan Wakely (cxx_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-12 12:51:12


On 12 January 2015 at 18:38, Nelson, Clark wrote:
> I think that we're really suffering from trying to back-fill feature-testing
> in cases where no thought was given to it on the front side. I think we need
> to get the EWG and LEWG to think about what makes sense for feature-testing
> before a feature is thrown over the wall to CWG/LWG.
>
> (Yes, I know -- in the specific case of digit separators, the political
> situation meant there was never any hope that it could be handled entirely
> by EWG; I'm talking about the general case.)
>
> Does anyone in SG10 consistently attend EWG or LEWG?

Am I "in" SG10 if I subscribe to this list? :-)

I split my time between LWG and LEWG, and I am at least aware of most
papers LEWG look at, so will try to remember to bring up the topic of
feature-testing early on.


SG10 list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com