Subject: Re: [SG10] Updates to SD-6
From: Nelson, Clark (clark.nelson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-05 12:37:02
> >> For N3928 Extending static_assert why not just bump up the date
> on __cpp_static_assert?
> > Yeah, that's definitely worth considering. The change is a
> pretty minor
> > tweak. (The recommendations I included for this were the ones
> > in N3928 -- thanks, Walter.)
> You're welcome, but I wish I had thought of Ed's suggestion.
> Unless anyone objects, I recommend we adopt it, as (1) I like it
> better than any of mine, and (2) doing so seems entirely
> consistent with our document:
Since Walter has now repudiated his original proposals, I have deleted them from the draft. Thanks, Ed.
SG10 list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com