C++ Logo


Advanced search

[SG10] Formally revising SD-6

From: Nelson, Clark <clark.nelson_at_[hidden]>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 17:15:52 +0000
I said previously that I thought we would be ready to revise the SD-6 on
isocpp.org before the Urbana meeting, and I still think that -- the text is
all but ready now. But in thinking about the process of publishing the
revision, I had a new thought.

I think it would be a good idea to have the practice of publishing a WG21
N-document with the text we want SD-6 to have, and then basically to copy
that document to isocpp.org to become the new SD-6. (That would be like an
extremely primitive form of version control.)

It might (or might not) also be a good idea to announce at a meeting that we
have a revision ready to publish, to give people a chance to comment. That
certainly has the advantage of transparency; the interesting question is
whether the added delay would be worth it. In this particular instance, that
would postpone the update by just about three months.

Any comments?

Clark Nelson            Vice chair, PL22.16 (ANSI C++ standard committee)
Intel Corporation       Chair, SG10 (C++ SG for feature-testing)
clark.nelson_at_[hidden]  Chair, CPLEX (C SG for parallel language extensions)

Received on 2014-08-19 19:16:34