C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG10] New draft of SD-6

From: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd_at_[hidden]>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:56:08 -0500
On 02/20/2014 01:29 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote:
> I have attached a new draft of our recommendations, which at least starts
> to take into account what has happened since Chicago. We need to talk about
> it. I haven't yet heard any objection to meeting on March 17.
> I am also thinking of putting a document into the post-meeting mailing,
> with tables for the TSpecs like we have for C++14, just to give people some
> kind of starting point. I will distribute that for SG10 comment next week.
> We won't have an opportunity for a telecon before finalizing it, but since
> the main goal of the document is just to get onto WG agendas in Rapperswil,
> hopefully that won't be a problem.
> --
> Clark Nelson Vice chair, PL22.16 (ANSI C++ standard committee)
> Intel Corporation Chair, SG10 (C++ SG for feature-testing)
> clark.nelson_at_[hidden] Chair, CPLEX (C SG for parallel language extensions)
> _______________________________________________
> Features mailing list
> Features_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features

Shouldn't |__cpp_lib_shared_mutex
be in the <shared_mutex> header rather than the <mutex> header?


Received on 2014-02-25 03:56:40