Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:06:13 +0000
From: Ed Smith-Rowland [mailto:3dw4rd_at_[hidden]]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 5:56 PM
> Shouldn't __cpp_lib_shared_mutex be in the <shared_mutex> header rather than the <mutex> header?
I agree there's a problem with what I put in the draft, but moving the macro
is not the solution.
The question that needs to be answered is whether <shared_mutex> can be
included at all. So probably the test should use __has_include.
Clark
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 5:56 PM
> Shouldn't __cpp_lib_shared_mutex be in the <shared_mutex> header rather than the <mutex> header?
I agree there's a problem with what I put in the draft, but moving the macro
is not the solution.
The question that needs to be answered is whether <shared_mutex> can be
included at all. So probably the test should use __has_include.
Clark
Received on 2014-03-13 18:08:27