Subject: Re: [SG10] __cpp_lib_constexpr_functions
From: John Spicer (jhs_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-27 13:17:29
On Aug 27, 2013, at 1:19 PM, "Nelson, Clark" <clark.nelson_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> | So how do you think we should respond to Matt's feedback?
>> Agree with Matt that in less than 10 years most of these macros
>> pointless. I think implementations are progressing faster that,
>> what we
>> had at comparable stage for C++98.
> What I would like to know is what you think we should do this week. Should
> we not recommend any macro for these constexpr functions?
I think we should not recommend a macro for these functions. We can always revisit this later, but if we have concerns, I think it is better to leave it out.
SG10 list run by email@example.com