> | So how do you think we should respond to Matt's feedback?
>
> Agree with Matt that in less than 10 years most of these macros
> will
> pointless. I think implementations are progressing faster that,
> what we
> had at comparable stage for C++98.

What I would like to know is what you think we should do this week. Should
we not recommend any macro for these constexpr functions?

Clark