Subject: Re: [SG10] __cpp_lib_constexpr_functions
From: Nelson, Clark (clark.nelson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-27 12:19:49
> | So how do you think we should respond to Matt's feedback?
> Agree with Matt that in less than 10 years most of these macros
> pointless. I think implementations are progressing faster that,
> what we
> had at comparable stage for C++98.
What I would like to know is what you think we should do this week. Should
we not recommend any macro for these constexpr functions?
SG10 list run by firstname.lastname@example.org