Subject: Re: [SG10] __cpp_lib_constexpr_functions
From: Gabriel Dos Reis (gdr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-27 12:17:13
"Nelson, Clark" <clark.nelson_at_[hidden]> writes:
| > | Benjamin: Maybe only have one macro __cpp_lib_constexpr, not
| > individual
| > | macros for each chapter. Do not go sub-modular right now.
| > I made the same remarks when you asked for feedback.
| So how do you think we should respond to Matt's feedback?
Agree with Matt that in less than 10 years most of these macros will
pointless. I think implementations are progressing faster that, what we
had at comparable stage for C++98.
SG10 list run by firstname.lastname@example.org